Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 8;8(11):e024777. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024777

Table 6.

Characteristics of original articles and reviews with plagiarism (n=495)

Characteristic Overall plagiarism n (%)
Any (%) Some (%) Moderate (%) Extensive (%)
Impact factor
 Yes (n=45) 23 (51) 9 (20) 10 (22) 4 (9)
 No (n=450) 290 (64) 125 (28) 86 (19) 79 (18)
Open access
 Yes (n=342) 206 (60) 85 (25) 64 (19) 57 (17)
 No (n=153) 107 (70) 49 (32) 32 (21) 26 (17)
Scope general
 Yes (n=239) 171 (72) 71 (30) 58 (24) 42 (18)
 No (n=256) 142 (55) 63 (25) 38 (15) 41 (16)
Member of African Journals Partnership Project
 Yes (n=35) 22 (63) 12 (34) 6 (17) 4 (11)
 No (n=460) 291 (63) 122 (27) 90 (20) 79 (17)
Plagiarism policy available
 Yes (n=127) 69 (54) 31 (24) 21 (17) 17 (13)
 No (n=368) 244 (66) 103 (28) 75 (20) 66 (18)
Reference to text matching software
 Yes (n=80) 34 (43) 18 (23) 11 (14) 5 (6)
 No (n=415) 279 (67) 116 (28) 85 (20) 78 (19)
Commercial publisher
 Yes (n=205) 112 (55) 51 (25) 33 (16) 28 (14)
 No (n=290) 201 (69) 83 (29) 63 (22) 55 (19)
Country of corresponding author
 Nigeria (n=250) 175 (70) 63 (25) 63 (25) 49 (20)
 South Africa (n=83) 32 (39) 19 (23) 6 (7) 7 (8)
 Other African country (n=99) 67 (68) 33 (33) 17 (17) 17 (17)
 Non-African country (n=63) 39 (62) 19 (30) 10 (16) 10 (16)
Type of study
 Cross sectional study (n=247) 164 (66) 78 (32) 50 (20) 36 (15)
 Retrospective study (n=65) 40 (62) 22 (34) 10 (15) 8 (12)
 Case report (n=42) 27 (62) 10 (24) 9 (21) 8 (19)
 Trial (n=36) 23 (64) 6 (17) 10 (28) 7 (19)
 Cohort study (n=22) 9 (41) 1 (5) 4 (18) 4 (18)
 Review (n=21) 14 (67) 4 (19) 0 10 (48)
 Case control study (n=12) 8 (67) 0 5 (42) 3 (25)
 Case series (n=12) 5 (42) 3 (25) 0 2 (17)
 Qualitative study (n=9) 6 (67) 3 (33) 3 (33) 0
 Laboratory study (n=8) 6 (75) 2 (25) 2 (25) 2 (25)
 Mixed methods (n=7) 2 (29) 1 (14) 0 1 (14)
 Before–after (n=7) 3 (43) 2 (29) 1 (14) 0
 Controlled before–after (n=7) 6 (86) 2 (29) 2 (29) 2 (29)