Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 31;3:85. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2018.10.09

Table 2. Endoscopic modalities for managing upper gastrointestinal defects.

Type of defect Location Preferred modality Clinical success (%) Reference
Perforation Esophagus TTSC (<1 cm) 100%†,‡ (45)
OTSC (<2 cm) 92–100 (45,50)
Suturing >90% (64)
SEPS 66–100% (70-73)
SEMS 70–100% (74-77)
EVT >90% (45,78)
Stomach
<1 cm TTSC 96–98% (79-81)
1–2 cm OTSC 71–100% (82,83)
Duodenum
Type 1 Clips
Type 2 TTS/OTSC 80–90% (84-86)
Type 3 Surgery, biliary stent
Fistula TEF
Malignant FSEMS >90% (87)
Benign FSEMS, SEPS 76–90% (88)
Gastrocutaneous/gastro-gastric OTSC 75–89% (87,89,90)
Glue, mesh, tissue grafts†,‡
Suturing 40–80% (64,88)
Leak Gastroesophageal FSEMS +/− OTSC (64,91)
EVT 78–94 (68)
Gastro-jejunal OTSC, glue, sutures (67)

, limited data; , case reports/case series/pooled analysis. TTSC, through-the-scope clip; OTSC, over-the-scope clip; SEPS, self-expandable plastic stent; FSEMS, fully-covered self-expandable metal stent; EVT, endoscopic vacuum therapy.