Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 16;9:2373. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02373

Table 1.

Table summarizing different single-cell analysis tools discussed in this review in terms of their advantages, disadvantages, and applications.

Research applications Advantages Limitation Commercial vendors References
Cytometry Cytokine and surface markers
Signaling and activation dynamics
Cytotoxicity
Immunophenotyping
Sorting
High throughput
Quick to run (on the order of several hours)
Ability to sort cells based on expression of molecules
Spectral overlaps
Expensive
Not possible to replicate dynamic cellular microenvironment
Static snapshot over time
BD Biosciences, MilliporeSigma, Miltenyi Biotec, Thermo Fisher Scientific (177), (178), (179)
MICROSYSTEMS
Nano wells Antibody and drug screening
Activation dynamics
Cytotoxicity
Inter and intra cellular communication
Cytokines and signaling molecules release
High-throughput
Possibility to recover cells from the wells
Simple to use
Multiplexing and real time monitoring
Quantitative analysis of proteins
Possibility to pair multiple cells in each well
Seeding cells under the effect of gravity lowers the efficiency of cell loading
Manual operation
Limited control over the fluidic and cellular microenvironment
Random distribution of cells in wells
μFluidix, microfluidic ChipShop (76), (77), (79), (80), (163), (55), (78)
MICROFLUIDICS
Trap-Based Inter and intracellular communication
Cytotoxicity
Signaling and activation dynamics
Cytokines and signaling molecules release
Efficient cell pairing and fusion
Ability to monitor cellular behavior, from the point of cellular interaction and contact
Multiplexing and real time monitoring
High throughput
Stimulation of cells in bulk and not on-chip (Juxtacrine and paracrine interactions before loading the cells cannot be ruled out)
Controlled on-chip stimulation is not possible
Cells are not isolated from each other (The trapped cells and secreted molecules are not completely confined and this can influence the behavior of the neighboring cells by paracrine communication)
μFluidix, microfluidic ChipShop (104), (105), (106), (96), (109)
Valve-based Signaling and activation dynamics
Cytokines and signaling molecules release
Monitor transcription factors activity
Migration
Complete automation
Replication of dynamic cellular microenvironment
Sensitive (addressable cell chambers with very small volume)
Low sample volume
Both real time monitoring and end-point analysis
Laborious and time-consuming fabrication
Not portable (additional equipment for operation)
Low to medium throughput
Fluidigm C1 (128), (129), (135), (16), (180), (181), (182)
Droplet-based Inter and intracellular communication
Cytokines and signaling molecules release
Activation dynamics
Antibody screening
Cytotoxicity
High throughput
Noise-free cellular microenvironment due to compartmentalization
Both real time monitoring and end point analysis
Multiple as well as single cell pairing
Sensitive (low reaction volume)
Small sample and reagent volume
Not possible to replicate dynamic cellular microenvironment
Random encapsulation (follows Poisson Distribution)
Difficult to incorporate washing steps
μFluidix, microfluidic ChipShop, Dolomite, Fluigent, 10X Genomics (Chromium Controller) BIORAD (ddSEQ) (144), (162), (164), (166), (167), (161)

The applications described here are what is presented in this review as well as all the other potential applications of the design for immune cell analysis at single-cell level.