Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 13.
Published in final edited form as: Surg Endosc. 2016 Dec 30;31(9):3527–3533. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5379-7

Table 3:

Results of the face validation questionnaire (Subjective preference of the VEST simulator)

# Question Response scores
Median Mean Std.
Dev
1 Better understanding of electrosurgical principles 5 4.33 0.98
2 More effective compared to textbooks 5 4.67 0.66
3 More enjoyable compared to textbooks 5 4.84 0.42
4 Using VEST simulator in skills lab 5 4.39 0.85
5 VEST simulator recommendation 5 4.55 0.67
6 Changing OR practices 4 3.82 1.20
7 Tissue effects 3 3.31 1.03
8 Instrument handling 3 3.02 1.01
9 Overall realism 3.5 3.52 0.76
10 Quality of force feedback 3 2.95 1.15
11 Usefulness of force feedback 4 3.33 1.16
12 Usefulness in learning hand-eye coordination compared to an animal model 4 3.82 1.01
13 Usefulness in learning electrosurgical technique compared to an animal model 4 3.94 0.94