Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 23;9:1953. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01953

Table 5.

Summary of linear regression analyses for variables predicting receptive vocabulary size for HL-dominant, SL-dominant bilinguals, and monolinguals.

HL-Dominant [N = 21]
SL-Dominant [N = 14]
Monolinguals [N = 32]
Variable B SE B ß B SE B ß B SE B ß
LexM 0.270 0.074 0.658∗∗ −0.061 0.052 −0.322 0.017 0.032 0.100
MorphM 0.314 0.192 0.296 0.112 0.117 0.267 0.063 0.045 0.252
R2 0.435 0.161 0.083
F 6.928∗∗ 1.057 1.306

LexM, Lexical metalinguistic awareness; MorphM, Morphological metalinguistic awareness. p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. One child was excluded from the analysis since he was missing lexical awareness scores.