Table 5.
HL-Dominant [N = 21] |
SL-Dominant [N = 14] |
Monolinguals [N = 32] |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | B | SE B | ß | B | SE B | ß | B | SE B | ß |
LexM | 0.270 | 0.074 | 0.658∗∗ | −0.061 | 0.052 | −0.322 | 0.017 | 0.032 | 0.100 |
MorphM | 0.314 | 0.192 | 0.296 | 0.112 | 0.117 | 0.267 | 0.063 | 0.045 | 0.252 |
R2 | 0.435 | 0.161 | 0.083 | ||||||
F | 6.928∗∗ | 1.057 | 1.306 |
LexM, Lexical metalinguistic awareness; MorphM, Morphological metalinguistic awareness. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. One child was excluded from the analysis since he was missing lexical awareness scores.