Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 23;9:1953. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01953

Table 6.

Summary of hierarchical regression analysis for variables predicting expressive vocabulary size (N = 35).

Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
Variable B SE B ß B SE B ß B SE B ß
RelProf 0.047 0.008 0.723∗∗∗ 0.040 0.008 0.617∗∗∗ 0.123 0.043 1.905∗∗
LexM 0.257 0.081 0.347∗∗ 0.296 0.078 0.399∗∗
MorphM 0.216 0.219 0.126 0.304 0.207 0.177
RelProf × LexM −0.069 0.030 −855
RelProf × MorphM −0.047 0.052 −0.507
R2 0.522 0.644 0.704
F 36.081∗∗∗ 18.717∗∗∗ 13.823∗∗∗

RelProf, Relative proficiency; LexM, Lexical metalinguistic awareness; MorphM, Morphological metalinguistic awareness.p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure