Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 7;12(6):615–624. doi: 10.1007/s11571-018-9490-4

Table 1.

Results of simulation and chicken retinal experiments

Simulation experiment KL SL KP SP Population response of RGCs
Natural stimuli 5.111 0.587 5.019 0.578 65% show negative response
Random checkerboard stimuli 1.308 0.418 1.499 0.319 72% show negative response
Chicken retinal experiment KL SL KP SP Population response of RGCs
Natural stimuli 8.827 0.802 10.250 0.852 68% show negative response
Random checkerboard stimuli 3.780 0.777 3.500 0.802 73% show negative response

Results of the lifetime sparseness (KL,SL) and population sparseness (KP,SP) of the neuronal activities in response to natural and random checkerboard stimuli