Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 8;33(7):1093–1104. doi: 10.1037/pag0000298

Table 1. Parameters Used to Simulate Data from Drift-Diffusion Model, Derived from Ratcliff, Thapar, et al. (2004).

Scenario Drift rate easy (v1) Drift rate hard (v2) Boundary separation (a) Nondecision time (Ter)
Note. Individual parameter values in each scenario were generated from a normal distribution with means given in the first four rows and the SDs shown in the bottom row. Mean parameters that were varied between groups in each scenario are highlighted in bold, with the range shown for older adults. In Scenarios B, C, and D, the effect between groups in each scenario can be calculated by multiplying the Cohen’s d value by the SD (e.g., .2 × 50 ms for the smallest effect in nondecision time in Scenario D). For Scenario A, the difference of interest is the group difference in the difference between easy and hard drift rates. The SD of the difference (easy–hard drift rates) was .044.
Domain-specific deficit (A) .480 Young: .310 .155 490
Old: .301–.248
General slowing (B) Young: .480 Young: .310 .155 490
Old: .466–.382 Old: .296–.212
Strategic slowing (C) .480 .310 Young: .127 490
Old: .134–.179
Nondecision time (D) .480 .310 .155 Young: 440
Old: 450–510
SDs (all scenarios) .07 .07 .037 50