Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 24.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurogenet. 2018 Apr 24;32(2):118–126. doi: 10.1080/01677063.2018.1461866

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Distinct progression of age-dependent decline in phototaxis and negative geotaxis.

(A) 29 °C-reared individuals. (B) 23 °C-reared individuals. Points represent the mean photo-/geo-taxis index for WT flies. Error bars indicate SEM. (* p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA, Bonferroni-corrected rank-sum post hoc test. n = 7 – 40 flies per run, 2 – 4 runs per age, number of total flies per age group as indicated in parentheses)