Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 13;7:e37385. doi: 10.7554/eLife.37385

Table 1. Studies used in the meta-analyses and meta-regressions testing the across-study relationship between dominance rank and bib size in male house sparrows.

More information is available in the data files provided (Sánchez-Tójar et al., 2018a).

Study ID Reference Population ID Primary data? Number of groups* Total number of males Comments
1 Ritchison, 1985 Kentucky
(captivity)
No 3 35
2 Møller, 1987 Denmark
(wild)
Yes 3 37
3 Andersson and Åhlund, 1991 Sweden
(captivity)
No 10 20 Estimate originally reported as statistically non-significant.
4 Solberg and Ringsby, 1997 Norway
(captivity)
Yes 5 44
5 Liker and Barta, 2001 Hungary
(captivity)
Yes 1 10
6 Gonzalez et al., 2002 Spain
(captivity)
No 8 41
7 Hein et al., 2003 Kentucky
(wild)
Yes 4 39
8 Riters et al., 2004 Wisconsin
(captivity)
No 4 20
9 Lindström et al., 2005 New Jersey
(captivity)
No 4 28 Author shared processed data, but group ID was unavailable, so data were not re-analysed.
10 Bókony et al., 2006 Hungary
(captivity)
Yes 2 19
11 Buchanan et al., 2010 Scotland
(captivity)
No 14
5
56
20
Groups were tested twice. Post-breeding estimates originally reported as statistically non-significant.
12 Dolnik and Hoi, 2010 Austria
(captivity)
No 4
4
31
31
Groups were tested twice. Pre-infection estimates originally reported as statistically non-significant.
13 Rojas Mora et al., 2016 Switzerland
(captivity)
Yes 14 56
14 Lendvai et al. Hungary
(captivity)
Yes3 4 46 Unpublished data part of: Lendvai et al., 2004; Bókony et al., 2012
15 Tóth et al. Hungary
(captivity)
Yes3 3 35 Unpublished data part of: Tóth et al., 2009; Bókony et al., 2012
16 Bókony et al. Hungary
(captivity)
Yes3 4 26 Unpublished data part of: Bókony et al., 2010; Bókony et al., 2012
17 Sánchez-Tójar et al. Germany
(captivity)
Yes3 4 95 Unpublished study conducted in 2014.
18 Sánchez-Tójar et al. Lundy Island
(wild)
Yes3 7 172 Unpublished study conducted from 2013 to 2016.
19 Westneat Kentucky
(captivity)
Yes3 10 40 Unpublished study conducted in 2005.

*for primary data = yes, groups of birds containing less than four individuals were not included (see Materials and methods).

†Note: since most studies analysed more than one group of birds, the total number of males is different from group size in most cases (see below).

‡Information for the unpublished datasets is available in Appendix 1—table 5.