Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2018 May 13;80(6):2449–2463. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27221

Table 1.

Comparison of the CEST-MRF determined L-Arg concentrations, amine proton chemical exchange rates and water T1 relaxation times with the known concentrations, QUESP measured exchange rates, and variable TR (VTR) measured T1 relaxation times, respectively, for the various L-Arg phantoms. The mean ±standard deviation was calculated for the ROI drawn around each vial.

pH [L-Arg] (mM) kex (Hz) Water T1 (ms)

known MRF QUESP MRF VTR MRF
4.05 25 26.1±6.7 193.9±57.0 156.2±44.5 2492.8±51.8 2709.2±143.9
4.08 50 49.4±7.0 183.7±21.7 170.7±23.9 2802.9±60.0 2885.7±154.3
4.01 100 84.0±9.6 200.4±30.4 196.2±21.4 2628.3±52.6 2949±152.0
4.04 50 51.7±6.8 204.5±31.1 200.4±29.4 2669.7±55.7 2809.6±141.6
4.46 50 53.1±5.2 281.8±28.9 268.5±31.5 2608.3±50.2 2847.6±159.1
4.99 50 50.3±3.2 444.3±33.0 446.0±34.3 2854.1±58.7 2919.5176.2
5.05 25 26.9±2.7 384.2±61.1 375.5±53.6 2551.9±51.73 2500±0
5.02 50 55.1±3.4 420.9±45.3 392.4±39.5 2757.9±59.1 2507.7±34.6
5.02 100 110.0±6.4 437.8±82.7 424.5±30.7 2573.6±48.1 2721±197.3
4.99 50 50.4±2.9 444.1±86.7 491.5±40.9 2825.7±52.1 3073.2±244.6
5.43 50 62.7±3.6 670.0±120.8 692.6±50.6 2594.5±50.1 3117.4±229.3
5.96 50 57.9±3.4 1066.8±148.7 1219.4±65.0 2621.6±48.2 3164.4±222.3