Table 2.
Relevant outcomes of the endoscopic full-thickness resection and endoscopic-laparoscopic cooperative procedure for gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors.
| Study | n, GIST1 | Method | Mean tumor size (mm) | Mean procedure time (min) | Complete resection rate (%) | Complication (%) | Mean follow-up (mo), recurrence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhou et al. [44] (2011) | 26, 16 | EFTR | 28.0 | 105.0 | 100 | 0 | 8.0, 0 |
| Feng et al. [45] (2014) | 48, 43 | EFTR | 15.9 | 59.7 | 100 | 1.0 | 6.0–24 (range), 0 |
| Kappelle et al. [48] (2017) | 13, 2 | EFTR2 | 11.0 | — | 84.6 | 38.5 | 3.0–6.0 (range), 0 |
| Ye et al. [46] (2014) | 51, 30 | EFTR | 24.0 | 52.0 | 98.0 | 0 | 22.4, 0 |
| Hiki et al. [49] (2008) | 7, 7 | LECS | 46.0 | 169.0 | 100 | 0 | — |
| Namikawa and Hanazaki [50] (2015) | 8, 8 | LECS | 31.0 | 213.0 | 100 | 0 | — |
| Mitsui et al. [52] (2011) | 6, 5 | NEWS | 34.8 | 273.5 | 100 | 0 | 8, 0 |
| Goto et al. [53] (2016) | 20, —3 | NEWS | —3 | 213.5 | 100 | 5.0 | 10.1, 0 |
| Nabeshima et al. [54] (2015) | 2, 2 | CLEAN-NET | 37.5 | 165.04 | 100 | 0 | — |
| Hajer et al. [56] (2018) | 10, 4 | NEWS CLEAN-NET | 32.7 | 99 | 100 | 20 | — |
| 2, 2 | 37.5 | 150 | 100 | 0 |
1Total number of pathologically diagnosed GIST. 2EFTR using a new flat-based over-the-scope clip. 3Data unavailable due to limited access. 4One case underwent CLEAN-NET and cholecystectomy procedure. EFTR = endoscopic full-thickness resection; LECS = laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery; NEWS = nonexposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery; CLEAN-NET = endoscopic approaches to neoplasia with nonexposed technique.