Table 5.
Ref | First Author | Year | Total Risk Scorea (out of 11 criteriab) | % score | Final Risk Level (0–25% = high risk, 26–75% = moderate risk, 76–100% = low risk) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
[35] | Ajuwon | 2013 | 6 | 54.55 | Moderate |
[39] | Klinger | 2016 | 8 | 72.73 | Moderate |
[42] | Leonard | 2000 | 8 | 72.73 | Moderate |
[13] | Manafa | 2006 | 6 | 54.55 | Moderate |
[46] | Miller | 2008 | 7 | 63.64 | Moderate |
[37] | Ndebele | 2012 | 7 | 63.64 | Moderate |
[36] | Srinivas | 2013 | 5 | 45.45 | Moderate |
[44] | Talbot | 2013 | 7 | 63.64 | Moderate |
[47] | Visser | 2005 | 5 | 45.45 | Moderate |
[48] | Temmerman | 1990 | 6 | 54.55 | Moderate |
[41] | Geibel | 2012 | 7 | 63.64 | Moderate |
a See Additional file 1: Table S7 for specific scores on each of the 11 criteria
b One of the original tool’s criteria; “in the case of group-level interventions, adjustments made for use of individual data to determine group level effects”, was not relevant to any of the included studies, and, as recommended by the tool developers, was thus not included in the assessment