TABLE 5.

Self-reported confidence gains before and after attending FT^a

	Before			After
Learning objective	n	Mean	SD	n	Mean	SD	Differenceb
To use the available RMT curricula and supporting resources	276	3.06	1.440	279	4.99	1.281	p < 0.000
To describe evidence to support the effectiveness of RMT	278	2.96	1.542	279	4.67	1.414	p < 0.000
To facilitate RMT using the process-based approach	276	3.04	1.496	277	4.94	1.327	p < 0.000
To recruit mentors to participate in training	274	3.22	1.486	274	4.52	1.415	p < 0.000
To implement RMT at your home institution	275	3.17	1.599	277	4.95	1.425	p < 0.000
To use metrics and tools to assess the effectiveness and impact of RMT	277	2.92	1.552	277	4.47	1.488	p < 0.000
To understand the implementation process	161	3.41	1.723	161	5.58	1.273	p < 0.000

^aData source: FT evaluation survey.

^bDifferences in ratings before and after FT were determined by Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Confidence was rated on a seven-point Likert scale: 1 = not at all confident, 4 = moderately confident, 7 = extremely confident.