FIGURE 3.
Frequency comparison for the top four ideas provided as anonymous comments on peer evaluations. Student groups were categorized as higher-performing (n = 32) and lower-performing (n = 33) based on the rank-ordered group assignment scores and averaged group test scores. A total of 1221 comments on peer evaluations were coded using 21 a priori categories. Each number (%) in the figure is calculated as the frequency of the code/total numbers of submitted comments.