Skip to main content
. 2018 Fall;17(3):ar52. doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-09-0199

TABLE 2.

Interviewee profiles

Pseudonym Individual scoring H/L Group performance HG/LG Description
1 Monica H HG In a group with a lower scorer, Amy, and two other midscorers
2 Min H HG Created a purposeful group with Chen, another higher scorer, and two lower scorers
3 Chen H HG In a group with Min and two lower scorers
4 Beth H HG In a group with two lower scorers and another higher scorer
5 Ginger H HG Higher scorer in a group with three midscorers
6 Chloe H LG Higher scorer in a group with three midscorers
7 Nora H LG Only higher scorer in a group with a midscorer and a lower scorer
8 Ethan L HG Only lower scorer in a group with two midscorers
9 Jenn L HG In a group with another lower scorer and two midscorers
10 Amy L HG In a group with higher scorer, Monica, and two midscorers
11 Emma L LG In a group with three other lower scorers
12 Ruth L LG In a group with three other lower scorers
13 Karen L LG In a group with three other lower scorers
14 Brian L LG In a group with three mid scorers
15 Zoe L LG In a group with two higher scorers and lower scorers

H = Higher scorer, L = Lower scorer, HG = Higher-performing group, LG = Lower-performing group.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure