Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 7;9:1593. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01593

Table 3.

Effects of drought on the sizes of soil carbon and microbial marker lipid pools for the peak drought and the recovery labeling campaigns.

Labeling Parameter C content (μgC gdm-1)

Control Drought D a
Peak drought EOC 34 ± 4 102 ± 8 ∗∗∗
MBC 402 ± 33 429 ± 20 n.s.
AM fungi 24 ± 3 17 ± 2
Saprotrophic fungi 1.1 ± 0.1 1.2 ± 0.2 n.s.
Gram (-) bacteria 5.7 ± 0.4 7.1 ± 0.3 ∗∗
Gram (+) bacteria 4.1 ± 0.3 4.8 ± 0.2
Actinobacteria 2.4 ± 0.2 2.9 ± 0.1
Recovery EOC 32 ± 3 32 ± 1 n.s.
MBC 393 ± 18 393 ± 15 n.s.
AM fungi 34 ± 2 19 ± 2 ∗∗∗
Saprotrophic fungi 0.9 ± 0.1 0.9 ± 0.1 n.s.
Gram (-) bacteria 6.0 ± 0.4 6.6 ± 0.4 n.s.
Gram (+) bacteria 4.3 ± 0.3 4.6 ± 0.4 n.s.
Actinobacteria 2.8 ± 0.2 2.9 ± 0.2 n.s.

aLevels of significance for drought effects: ∗∗∗Paovp < 0.001, ∗∗Paovp < 0.01, Paovp < 0.05, (∗)Paovp < 0.1; n.s., not significant. AM, arbuscular mycorrhizal; EOC, extractable organic carbon; MBC microbial biomass carbon. Values represent averages among the mesocosms for each treatment (mean ± SE, n = 6), after averaging over the sampling times (four for EOC and MBC, two for microbial marker lipids) for each mesocosm.