Table 1.
Chemo vs. Chemo + BMS-906024 | Chemo vs. ChemoRT + BMS-906024 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
SSGD | Synergism | SSGD | Synergism | |
H1299 | ||||
Cisplatinɤ | *** | ns | * | ** |
Etoposide | *** | ns | ** | ns (0.07) |
Paclitaxel | ns | ns | *** | *** |
Docetaxel | ***(BMS effect) | * | *** | * |
Pemetrexedɤ | ns | ns | ns | ns |
Crizotinib | ** | ns | * | *** |
H460 | ||||
Paclitaxel | ns | ns | *** | *** |
Crizotinib | *** | *** | *** | *** |
Chemotherapeutics (1.2 μM Cisplatin, 0.1 μM Etoposide, 2.5 nM Paclitaxel, 1 nM Docetaxel, 0.25 μM Pemetrexed, 0.4 μM (H1299) or 0.8 μM (H460) Crizotinib) were combined with 1 or 0.1 μM (ɤ) of γ-secretase inhibitor BMS-906024 and/or single dose 2 Gy radiation, and compared to their respective treatment control without BMS-906024. A minimum of 12 individual spheroids were tested per condition. Ns, not significant;
p-value < 0.001,
p-value < 0.01 and
< 0.050. “BMS effect” note indicates that there was no difference between BMS-906024 treatment and the combination treatment of BMS-906024 with chemotherapeutic.