Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 24;18(6):1–139.

Table 11:

Speech Perception in Noise—Children

Author, Year Test Measures UCI and BCI P Value
Cullington et al, 201783 S0N0a No significant difference in combined ATT and BKB results between UCI and BCIb NS
Peters et al, 200786 S0N0
S0NCI1
At 9 months, BCI performed significantly better than UCI on CRISP, regardless of age, as follows:  
S0NCI2 S0N0: 6.8% .008
  S0NCI1: 13.2% < .001
  S0NCI2: 6.8% < .02
Reeder et al, 201787 SNRc,d (dB) Significantly lower SNR in BKB-SIN and R-space for BCI vs. either UCIb < .05
Scherf et al, 200788; Scherf et al, 200989 % correct wordse < 6 years old  
Higher scores comparing BCI vs. either cochlear implantb 18 months: .028 (CI1)
  18 months: .043 (CI2)
  24 months: NS (Cl1, CI2)
  36 months: .042 (CI1)
  36 months: .043 (Cl2)
6 years old
No difference in scores comparing BCI vs. either cochlear implantb
18 months: NS (CI1, CI2)
  24 months: .001 (Cl1)
  24 months: .002 (Cl2)
  36 months: .002 (Cl1)
  36 months: .002 (Cl2)
Sparreboom et al, 201192 S0NCI1
SNR (dB SPL)c,d
Own control
Significantly lower SNR comparing BCI vs. first or second cochlear implantb
6 months: < .05
  12 months: < .05
  24 months: < .05
Separate UCI control group
Significantly lower SNR comparing BCI vs. UCI at
12 months: .42
24 months but not at 12 monthsb 24 months: < .01
Sparreboom et al, 201494 % phoneme score BCI obtained an average 9.5% (95% CI 3.5%–15.4%) higher phoneme score than UCI at 5-year follow-up NR

Abbreviations: ATT, Automated Toy Discrimination Test; BCI, bilateral cochlear implantation; BKB, Bamford-Kowal Bench; BKB-SIN, Bamford-Kowal Bench Speech in Noise; CI1, first cochlear implant, CI2, second cochlear implant; CRISP, Children's Realistic Intelligibility and Speech Perception test; NR, not reported; NS, not significant; R-space, random-space; S0N0, speech and noise from the front; S0NCI1, speech from the front and noise from first cochlear implant side; S0NCI2, speech from the front and noise from second cochlear implant side; SNR, signal-to-noise ratio; SPL, sound pressure level; SRT, speech reception threshold; UCI, unilateral cochlear implantation.

a

Only children who scored a speech perception threshold of 55 dB or better in quiet proceeded to noise testing.

b

Results presented in figures. Numeric data unavailable.

c

A lower SNR indicates better performance.

d

Signal-to-noise ratio was calculated by subtracting the fixed noise level of 60 dB SPL from the obtained SRT.

e

Testing was not done before 18 months of second cochlear implant use because of the difficult nature of the task.