Figure 1. A and D depict the general design used for the 8-to-4 (n = 10) and 16-to-32 (n = 10) groups, respectively.
(B) and (E) show average normalized response rate during probe trials during initial training and testing for the 8-to-4 and 16-to-32 groups, respectively. For presentation, each curve was normalized by the maximum value and smoothed over a 6-bin window. (C) and (F) show percent-change in peak time during testing (±SEM), relative to initial training for the 8-to-4 and 16-to-32 groups, respectively. Stars indicate significance (p<0.05).
Figure 1—source data 1. Data used to generate Figure 1.
elife-38790-fig1-data1.zip (303.1KB, zip)
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.38790.010
Figure 1—source data 2. Table showing percent change in peak, start, and stop times (+/- SEM) for the unchanged cue across all experiments.
Stars indicate significance under an alpha level of .05. Tildes indicate marginally significant effects (p < .1).
elife-38790-fig1-data2.docx (85KB, docx)
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.38790.009
Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Raw probe trial response rates during training and testing for all experiments.
A shows responding in the 8-to-4 (left) and 16-to-32 (right) groups of Experiment 1. B shows responding in the no-change control group of Experiment 1. (C) shows responding in the 8-to-12 group of Experiment 2. (D) shows responding for the change (left) and no-change (right) groups of Experiment 3. (E) shows responding in the correlated (left) and uncorrelated (right) groups of Experiment 4a. (F) shows the same for Experiment 4b. (G) shows responding during testing in the no-change (left) and change (right) contexts of Experiment 5.
Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Data used to generate Figure 1—figure supplement 1.
elife-38790-fig1-figsupp1-data1.zip (2.2MB, zip)
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.38790.004
Figure 1—figure supplement 2. A and B depict design schematics (left panels) and average percent change in start/stop times (±SEM; right panels) for the 8-to-4 and 16-to-32 groups for Experiment 1, respectively.
(C) shows the same for the no-change control group.
Figure 1—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Data used to generate Figure 1—figure supplement 2.
elife-38790-fig1-figsupp2-data1.zip (304.1KB, zip)
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.38790.006
Figure 1—figure supplement 3. Same as Figure 1—figure supplement 2, but showing single-trial averages (±SEM) for the remainder of the groups in the experiments (A, B, C, D, and E correspond to the 8-to-12 group of Experiment 2, both groups included in Experiment 3, the two Experiment 4 groups, and Experiment 5, respectively).
Three rats in Experiment 5 did not show any trials that met our criteria for being included in the single trial analysis (>2 responses and a start and stop time that occurred before and after the peak time, respectively). In those cases, they were omitted when computing the averages and statistics.
Figure 1—figure supplement 3—source data 1. Data used to generate Figure 1—figure supplement 3.
elife-38790-fig1-figsupp3-data1.zip (2.2MB, zip)
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.38790.008