Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 2;7:e38790. doi: 10.7554/eLife.38790

Figure 4. Top panels of A and B show designs used for the change (n = 5) and no-change (n = 5) groups of Experiment 3, respectively.

Mean normalized response rate for the critical, long cue during initial training and testing are plotted in the corresponding bottom panels. (C) shows percent change in peak times for the short and long cues in each group during testing (±SEM).

Figure 4—source data 1. Data used to generate Figure 4.
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.38790.018

Figure 4.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1. A and B show probe trial responding during initial training and testing for the short and long cues in the change (n = 5) and no-change (n = 5) groups of Experiment 3, respectively.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

C shows percent change in peak time at test (±SEM) for both groups, relative to initial training.
Figure 4—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Data used to generate Figure 4—figure supplement 1.
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.38790.017