Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 15.
Published in final edited form as: Atmos Chem Phys. 2018 Jul 18;18(14):10199–10218. doi: 10.5194/acp-18-10199-2018

Table 2.

Meteorological model and CTM used by each participant. More specific information regarding both meteorological and chemical transport models is included in Solazzo et al. (2017) and Colette et al. (2017).

AQMEII3 EDT

METEO* CTM* METEO** CTM**
AQ_DE1_HTAP COSMO-CLMy CMAQ (v4.7.1) ED_CHIM WRF-Common*** CHIMERE (Chimere2017b v1.0)
AQ_DK1_HTAP WRF (v 3.6) DEHM ED_CMAQ WRF-Common (adapted to different projection) CMAQ (v5.0.2)
AQ_FI1_HTAP/_MACC ECMWF SILAM ED EMEP WRF-Common EMEP (rv4.7)
AQ_FRES1_HTAP ECMWF CHIMERE
(vchim2013)
ED_LOTO RACMO2 LOTOS (v1.10.005)
AQ_UK1_MACC WRF (v3.4.1) CMAQ (v5.0.2) ED_MATCH HIRLAM MATCH (VSOA April 2016)
AQ_UK2_HTAP WRF (v3.5.1) CMAQ (v5.0.2) ED MINNI WRF-Common MINNI (V4.7)
AQ_TR1_MACC WRF (v3.5) CMAQ (v4.7.1)

EMISSIONS: Copernicus 0.125° × 0.0625°-HTAP_v2.2 0.1° × 0.1°; annual and monthly. EMISSIONS: ECLIPSE_V5, 0.5° × 0.5°, regriddedto 0.25° × 0.25°; annual.

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS: C-IFS (CB05), 0.125° × 0.125°; every 3 h. BOUNDARY CONDITIONS: 1.5° × 1.5°; monthly.
*

More information in Solazzo et al. (2017).

**

More information in Colette et al. (2017).

***

As defined in Colette et al. (2017).