Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 14;9:4773. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07117-w

Table 1.

Cryo-EM data collection, refinement and validation statistics

Apo Sensitized hTRPV32-APB 1 hTRPV32-APB 2 hTRPV32-APB 3
hTRPV3 hTRPV3
6MHO 6MHS 6MHV 6MHW 6MHX
EMD-9115 EMD-9117 EMD-9119 EMD-9120 EMD-9121
Data collection and processing
 Magnification ×22,500 ×45,000 ×36,000
 Voltage (kV) 300 200 200
 Electron exposure (e- Å–2) 63 67 60 60 60
 Defocus range (μm) −0.5 to −2 −0.8 to −1.4 −1.2 to −2 −1.2 to −2 −1.2 to −2
 Pixel size (Å) 1.31 0.915 1.15 1.15 1.15
 Detector Super-resolution Counting Counting Counting Counting
 Total extracted particles (no.) 361,244 559,206 897,643
 Refined particles (no.) 215,346 339,693 589,656
Reconstruction
 Final particles (no.) 27,620 44,554 141,832 61,292 84,307
 Symmetry imposed C4 C4 C4 C2 C2
Nominal resolution (Å)
 FSC 0.143 (unmasked/masked) 4.21/3.38 4.10/3.24 3.83/3.45 4.98/3.99 4.91/3.99
 Map sharpening B factor (Å2) −73 −51 −145 −152 −144
Refinement
Model composition
   Non-hydrogen atoms 17,032 17,784 18,336 17,892 16,956
   Protein residues 2404 2428 2452 2452 2436
   Ligands 0 0 0 0 0
Validation
   MolProbity score 1.12 1.61 1.61 1.57 1.55
   Clashscore 3 6 7 7 7
   Poor rotamers (%) 0 0 0 0.1 0
Ramachandran plot
   Favored (%) 98 96 96 97 97
   Allowed (%) 2 4 4 3 3
   Disallowed (%) 0 0 0 0 0