Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 14;4:37. doi: 10.1038/s41523-018-0090-6

Table 3.

Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Modela assessing interaction of recurrence score (RS) risk group (Grouping Method I) with chemotherapy effect, excluding patients with presumed HER2-positive disease

n = 564 patients
Effect Hazard ratio
(95% Confidence interval)
Likelihood ratio test on interaction,
P value
Chemotherapy in RS ≤ 10 1.19 (0.41–3.51) 0.014
Chemotherapy in RS from 11–25 0.61 (0.26–1.35)
Chemotherapy in RS > 25 0.27 (0.12–0.62)

a Adjusting for patient age (>50 vs. ≤50 years), clinical tumor size (>2.0 vs. ≤2.0 cm), ER by ligand binding assay (≥100 vs. <100 fmol/mg), PR by ligand binding assay (≥100 vs. <100 fmol/mg), and tumor grade (well differentiated, moderately differentiated, and poorly differentiated). Five (5) patients had missing values in tumor grade or tumor size.