Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 14;9(11):1132. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-1165-x

Table 2.

Factors associated with RFS and OS significantly found by multivariate analyses in our cohort

Factors RFS OS
HR (95% CI) P-value HR (95% CI) P-value
ALB: ≥ 35 vs < 35 g/L - 0.457 (0.249–0.839) 0.011
Tumour size: > 5 vs ≤ 5 cm 1.997 (1.408–2.832) <0.001 1.933 (1.313–2.844) 0.001
Encapsulation: complete vs incomplete or absence 0.684 (0.490–0.954) 0.025 0.662 (0.472–0.930) 0.017
Satellite nodules: yes vs no - -
PVTT: yes vs no 1.565 (1.006–2.436) 0.047 -
Edmonson grade: III+IV vs I+II - -
TNM: II+III+IV vs I - -
BCLC: B+C vs A 1.704 (1.182–2.456) 0.004 2.414 (1.690–3.447) <0.001
FBP1 expression: high vs low 0.576 (0.424–0.784)  < 0.001 0.582 (0.418–0.809) 0.001

ALB albumin, FBP1 fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase 1, BCLC stage Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage, TNM stage tumour-node-metastasis stage, PVTT portal vein tumour thrombosis