Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 14;8:16791. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35014-1

Table 3.

The changes of intestinal microflora in participates after L. reuteri consumption.

Microbial groups Placebo (N = 21)a,c ADR-1 (N = 22)a ADR-3 (N = 24)a P-valueb
placebo vs. ADR-1 placebo vs. ADR-3 ADR-1 vs. ADR-3
Lactobacillus_reuteri 1.53 ± 1.77 98.43 ± 174.3 6.23 ± 11.25 0.017 0.055 0.022
Lactobacillus spp. 2.51 ± 3.66 5.47 ± 20.02 14.53 ± 52.73 0.503 0.277 0.44
Bifidobacterium spp. 6.28 ± 19.74 3441 ± 15649 73.72 ± 156.2 0.315 0.049 0.324
Akkemansia muciniphila 25.84 ± 59.38 81.07 ± 268.2 170 ± 818.3 0.356 0.398 0.618
Clostridium cluster I 20.43 ± 81.26 2.21 ± 2.78 5.57 ± 10.21 0.317 0.415 0.132
Bacteroidetes 1.42 ± 1.29 7.21 ± 24.39 2.47 ± 3.53 0.28 0.18 0.38
Firmicutes 1.57 ± 2.71 1.62 ± 1.73 3.02 ± 3.35 0.94 0.12 0.08
Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes −99.37 ± 338.03 22.28 ± 166.75 −87.98 ± 213.26 0.15 0.9 0.06

aFecal microflora was analyzed by quantitative PCR as described in “Materials and Methods” section and presented as fold change at 6 month when compared with starting point (mean ± SD).

bTwo sample t-test analysis was used to compare mean values between groups as indicated.

cOne participate in placebo group lost stool sample.