. 2016 Oct 27;17(1):65–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2016.09.003

Table 2.

Correlations among the eight lower-order factors in samples 1 and 2 (controlled for age).

	Arousability	Sexual power dynamics	Smell	Partner characteristics	Setting	Relationship importance	Arousal contingency	Concerns about sexual function
Arousability	–	.40^**	.43^**	.41^**	−.20^**	−.17^**	−.10^**	.11^**
Sexual power dynamics	.37^**	–	.22^**	.20^**	−.26^**	−.21^**	−.17^**	−.01
Smell	.54^**	.26^**	–	.33^**	−.14^**	−.07	−.03	.13^**
Partner characteristics	.45^**	.21^**	.42^**	–	−.08^*	−.04	−.01	.17^**
Setting (unusual/unconcealed)	−.35^**	−.35^**	−.29^**	−.20^**	–	.38^**	.24^**	.18^**
Relationship importance	−.24^**	−.29^**	−.21^**	−.07	.36^**	–	.21^**	.23^**
Arousal contingency	−.19^**	−.15^**	−.16^**	−.05	.20^**	.26^**	–	.37^**
Concerns about sexual function	.05	−.07	.03	.11^*	.14^**	.24^**	.29^**	–

Note. Sample 1 = university students (data above the diagonal); Sample 2 = general population (data under the diagonal).

^**

p < .01.

p < .05.