Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 13;17(1):38–45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2016.07.002

Table 1.

Study of the difference in means in terms of predictive variables.

Areas Sex
Age
Habitual residence
Assessment method
p δ p δ p δ p δ
Personal health .01 .09 .01 .09 .03 .07 <.001 .15
Economic resources .39 .03 .20 .04 .02 .07 .07 .06
Health resources <.001 .10 .62 .02 .27 .04 <.001 .20
Social services resources .03 .07 .84 .01 <.001 .09 <.001 .11
Physical and social obstacles <.001 .11 .24 .04 .23 .04 <.001 .20
Support measures and networks <.001 .16 .03 .08 <.001 .18 .02 .08
Solutions needed <.001 .10 <.001 .14 <.001 .26 .57 .02
Future outlook <.001 .10 .07 .06 <.001 .17 .03 .07
Personal problems <.001 .13 .62 .02 .23 .04 .39 .03

Note. p = associated probability; δ=Effect size (Cliff's Delta).