Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 8.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Genet. 2018 Oct 8;50(11):1600–1607. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0231-8

Figure 6: Forward simulations enable inferences about negative selection and rare variant architectures.

Figure 6:

Results are based on forward simulations involving an annotation mimicking functional noncoding variants, as well as other annotations (see text). (a,b) We report the CVE (a) and LFVE/CVE ratio (b) of the functional noncoding annotation as a function of the mean selection coefficient for de novo deleterious variants (s¯dn) and the probability of a de novo variant to be causal (π) for this annotation. s¯dn and π values for non-synonymous and ordinary noncoding annotations are described in the main text. (c) We report the mean absolute selection coefficient of deleterious variants in the functional noncoding annotation as a function of s¯dn and MAF (rare, low-frequency, common). (d) We report the mean squared per-allele effect size of causal variants in the functional noncoding annotation (normalized by the mean squared per-allele effect size of rare causal non-synonymous variants) as a function of s¯dn and MAF (rare, low-frequency and common). Red lines denote the value s¯dn=−0.003 used to simulate non-synonymous variants, grey lines denote the value s¯dn=−0.0001 used to simulate ordinary noncoding variants (see main text). The value π=48% used in (d) (see Methods) is denoted via squares in (a) and (b). Numerical results are reported in Supplementary Table 12.