Table 1.
Coding sheet for critical appraisal.
Quality components | Yes/No (1/0) | Factors of the quality |
---|---|---|
Background and aim | a thorough research of related literature has been done and described well in the background of the study | |
illustrated significance of the study has been mentioned | ||
clear aim of the study has been included | ||
| ||
Design | number of the groups in the study | |
blinding of the study | ||
baseline for the targeted measurement has been developed | ||
sample size was appropriate to answer the question of the study | ||
| ||
Subjects | recruitment of subjects was illustrated clearly and following a strategy that is appropriate for the design | |
the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the subjects stated clearly | ||
Adherence of the patients to the suggested protocol | ||
withdrawal percentage of subjects from the sample size before statistical analysis does not affect the statistical analysis of the study | ||
groups in the study were from similar environments | ||
| ||
Intervention | treatment protocol was described clearly | |
treatment is equal for all subjects | ||
treatment efficacy was measured precisely | ||
| ||
Outcome | the outcome of the study was illustrated clearly | |
supported for clinical importance with validity and reliability | ||
follow up period to measure the persistence of the effects after the intervention | ||
| ||
Analysis | statistical analysis is well illustrated and suitable to measure the efficiency of the treatment | |
the statistical analysis has been supported by mention of the significance of the intervention (p-value) | ||
| ||
The study is replicable | The study is replicable by other researchers because of availability of the previous factors | |
| ||
Recommendation and conclusion | Recommendation and conclusion of the study were stated clearly and related to the results of the study |