Table 4.
Selected governance-related outcomes as predicted by participation in CARE’s Community Score Card© (subpopulation analysisb)
| Outcome | Estimate | Confidence Interval | t | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trust in health workers | −0.11 | − 0.22 - -0.00 | − 2.04 | .049 |
| Power sharing | 0.03 | −0.27 - 0.32 | 0.20 | .844 |
| Mutual responsibility | −0.09 | −0.16 - -0.03 | −2.97 | .005 |
| Negotiated spaces participation | 0.68 | 0.41–0.94 | 5.18 | <.001 |
| Joint monitoring and transparency | 0.10 | 0.01–0.20 | 2.29 | .029 |
| Equity and quality | 0.11 | 0.06–0.16 | 4.27 | <.001 |
| Collective efficacy | −0.07 | −0.22 - 0.08 | −0.99 | .331 |
| Outcomes of collective action (direct) | 0.13 | 0.07–0.20 | 4.02 | <.001 |
| Perceived health outcomes of collective action | 0.24 | 0.12–0.35 | 4.34 | <.001 |
| Is the HAC an effective bridge between the health facility and community? | −0.00 | −0.08 - 0.07 | −0.09 | .925 |
| Is there a Community Action Group or Safe Motherhood Committee? | 0.15 | 0.07–0.24 | 3.70 | <.001 |
| Does Community Action Group or Safe Motherhood Committee provide maternal and newborn health support? | −0.02 | −0.06 - 0.03 | − 0.70 | .490 |
| Community help | 0.26 | 0.04–0.48 | 2.44 | .020 |
aEstimates were obtained from separate models for each outcome. All models contained the following covariates: religion, ethnicity, current marital status, literacy, number of lifetime live births, wealth index, and nearest health facility providing delivery services
bAmong those women in the intervention areas who reported a meeting in their community