Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2018;12(2):145–156. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2018.0034

Table 4:

Suggested Metrics for CTSA Institutions

Counts based upon program activities
Number of early career (KL2) scholars trained for Community-engaged Research
Areas of CEnR partnerships (e.g., pediatrics, geriatrics, health disparities)
Use of Community Engagement consulting service by a) basic scientists, b) individual CTSA-funded studies
Researchers and projects seeking community stakeholder input
Community members involved in all individual CTSA-supported partnerships
Community member recruitment to clinical trials
Time to completion of Community-engaged Research projects
Repeat grant submissions, awards, publications by partnership – (assess longevity)
Contribution of community-engaged research to outcome measures
Outcomes of training for Translational stage 3 and Translational stage 4 research
Changes in research due to community-engaged activities
Shared-decision making in developing, conducting and reporting on research
Social network analysis to assess, for example, investigator collaboration with and input from community partner at key process points (e.g., scientific review, proposal submission and award, IRB submission, project implementation…).
Change in the community sense of accountability on the part of researchers
Changed community perception of academic research in the University and community
Community partner perception of benefit
Dissemination and implementation of research findings
Policy changes
Grants to communities informed by but independent of research
Counts of interactions among individual CTSAs
Number of institutions requesting measurement and evaluation information
Collaborative projects