Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 4;26(5):254–263. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2018.1456614

Table 1. Participant demographic data for the MC ‘squeeze’ and sham group.

Participant ID # Gender Age Sport/activity BMI Onset (duration of symptoms) Joint line point of treatment Total treatments
101 Male 45 Football coach 35.6 BMI Chronic Medial 5 squeeze
102 Male 23 Football 32.8 BMI Chronic Medial 4 squeeze
103 Female 53 General population 24.0 BMI Chronic Lateral 6 squeeze
104 Male 22 Soccer 24.3BMI Chronic Medial 3 squeeze
105 Male 20 Baseball 32.5 BMI Acute Medial 5 squeeze
106 Male 21 Track & field 23.6 BMI Acute Lateral 6 squeeze
107 Male 14 Basketball 18.5 BMI Acute Medial 3 squeeze
108 Female 18 Dance 29.9 BMI Chronic Lateral 5 squeeze
109 Female 21 ROTC 24.0 BMI Acute Medial 6 squeeze
110 Female 25 Swim coach 26.8 BMI Acute Medial 6 squeeze
111 Female 20 Basketball 21.30BMI Chronic Medial 6 squeeze
112 Male 16 Soccer 18.5 BMI Acute Lateral 4 squeeze
113a Male 33 Football/track coach 23.0 BMI Chronic Lateral 6 sham + 4 squeeze
114a Male 19 Baseball 25.7 BMI Chronic Lateral 4 sham
115a Female 20 Soccer 24.4 BMI Chronic Medial 5 sham
116a Female 19 Cross country 20.4 BMI Acute Medial 6 sham + 6 squeeze
117a Male 23 Football 31.0 BMI Acute Medial 6 sham + 5 squeeze
118a Female 19 ROTC 24.1 BMI Acute Lateral 6 sham
119a Female 18 Recreational basketball 21.3 BMI Chronic Medial 6 sham
120a Female 21 General population 35.2 BMI Chronic Medial 6 sham + 6 squeeze + 1 MWM**
121a Female 62 General population 30.4 BMI Chronic Posterior lateral 6 sham + 4 squeeze
122a Male 23 General population 33 BMI Chronic Lateral 5 sham
123a Female 18 Recreational basketball 21.3 BMI Chronic Medial 6 sham
a

Sham treatment group.

**

Notes alternate treatment used according to the study protocol in Figure 4.