Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet Neurol. 2018 Apr 30;17(6):548–558. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30126-1

Table 3. Loci identified in age at onset analysis.

Suggestive variants identified in the discovery stage (p<10−5) and followed-up in the replication stage, as well as the meta-analyses are represented. Variant p-values and beta values were calculated using an additive genetic model. Minor alleles were treated as effect alleles. The locus name is determined by the closest gene to the significant variant. MAF=minor allele frequency; P=p-value.

Discovery Replication
Variant Positiona Major/
minor
allele
Locus
name
MAF
patients/controls
Association MAF
patients/controls
Association Meta-analysisb
Beta
(95%CI)
P Beta
(95%CI)
P Beta
(95%CI)
P I2
rs116316277 2:185834886 C/T ZNF804A 0·03 8·09(4·72 − 11·6) 3·58×10−6 0·08 −1·03(-6·79 − 4·72) 7·26 × 10−1 5·76(2·85 − 8·67) 1·04×10−4 86·1
rs6809184 3:170888198 C/T TNIK 0·05 −6·78(−9·24 – −4·32) 1·22×10−7 0·09 −0·54(−5·29 − 4·21) 8·24 × 10−1 −5·46(−7·64 – −3·27) 1·01×10−6 80·9
rs12189587 6:165332257 C/T C6orf11 0·11 −4·05(−5·76 – −2·34) 4·83×10−6 0·13 1·4(−2·32 − 5·11) 4·62 × 10−1 −3·1(−4·65 – −1·54) 9·44×10−5 85·3
rs6962939 7:7524226 T/A COL28A1 0·04 −6·02(−8·61 – −3·43) 7·00×10−6 0·06 −6·15(−12·56 − 0·25) 6·13 × 10−2 −6·04(−8·43 – −3·64) 8·18×10−7 0
rs2922921 7:96398079 G/A SHFM1 0·02 9·65(5·58 − 13·72) 4·65×10−6 0·06 −0·54(−7·77 − 6·7) 8·84 × 10−1 7·20(3·65 − 10·75) 6·93×10−5 82·7
rs77466830 7:151529171 C/A PRKAG2 0·32 2·91(1·64 − 4·18) 9·49×10−6 0·43 −0·13(−2·36 − 2·11) 9·12 × 10−1 2·17(1·06 − 3·27) 1·18×10−4 81·3
rs9792144 8:53081551 C/G ST18 0·12 3·99(2·30 − 5·68) 4·88×10−6 0·18 2·99(−0·26 − 6·24) 7·28 × 10−2 3·78(2·28 − 5·28) 7·55×10−7 0
rs3922636 8:80383502 G/A STMN2 0·19 3·28(1·89 − 4·67) 5·08×10−6 0·31 0·49(−2·23 − 3·21) 7·23 × 10−1 2·70(1·47 − 3·94) 1·83×10−5 68·4
rs12943707 17:73317510 C/G GRB2 0·29 −2·8(−4·00 – −1·6) 6·40×10−6 0·4 −0·41(−2·80 − 1·98) 7·38 × 10−1 −2·32(−3·39 – −1·25) 2·22×10−5 67·5
rs1561819 18:2712629 G/A SMCHD1 0·49 −2·41(−3·46 – −1·36) 8·96×10−6 0·51 −0·81(−2·97 − 1·35) 4·61 × 10−1 −2·11(−3·05 – −1·16) 1·23×10−5 41·5
rs6108746 20:10902771 T/C JAG1 0·19 3·54(2·19 − 4·89) 4·23×10−7 0·25 1·69(−1·11 − 4·48) 2·38 × 10−1 3·19(1·98 − 4·41) 2·59×10−7 27·4
rs6111609 20:17664546 C/A RRBP1 0·22 2·86(1·61 − 4·11) 9·83×10−6 0·22 2·88(−0·03 − 5·8) 5·41 × 10−2 2·86(1·71 − 4·01) 1·05×10−6 0
a

Positions are based on the Human Genome version 38 (hg38).

b

For SNPs with I2 >0.3, a random effects meta-analysis was also performed. The p-values were generally larger in the random effects meta-analysis, and the results were consistent with the fixed effects, showing that none of these SNPs were significantly associated with the outcome.