Table 2:
Summary of the substantial CTG databases used in the literature is presented in chronological order, which however do not include raw 1D-DUS data.
| Study | Access | Subjects | Site | Application |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stroux et al. (2017); Stroux & Clifford (2016) | closed | 1163 IUGR and 1163 control cases at 23–42 weeks of gestation | Oxford, UK | FHR analysis markers for the detection of early IUGR |
| Georgieva et al. (2017) | closed | 22,790 women in labor, ≥36 weeks of gestation | Oxford, UK | Using CTG and clinical features to automatically identify the fetuses at risk of intrapartum hypoxia. |
| (Warrick & Hamilton, 2014) | closed | Intrapartum recordings from 5320 normal cases, 10 cases with neonatal depression and 99 with metabolic Acidosis | United States | discrimination of normal and at-risk populations from fetal HRV. |
| (Chudáček et al., 2014) | open | 552 intrapartum CTG selected from 9164 cases, ≥37 weeks of Gestation | Brno, Czech Republic | Providing an open-access CTG database for research on intrapartum CTG signal processing and analysis. |