Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2018 Oct 16;24(10):1026–1037. doi: 10.1017/S1355617718000772

Table 5.

Stepwise multiple regression results for Executive Function model.

Variables INI
β (SE)
Group x INI
β (SE)
20Q
β (SE)
Group x 20Q
β (SE)
Final Model
β (SE)a
Group 23.583** (1.698) 23.595** (1.702) 24.323** (1.647) 24.474** (1.643) 23.017** (1.688)
INI 0.947** (0.209) 0.897** (0.299) 0.820** (0.218)
20Q 1.002** (0.242) 0.494 (0.372) 0.070 (0.383)
Group x INI 0.098 (0.419)
Group x 20Q 0.875* (0.488) 1.001** (0.490)
Constant 78.016** (1.204) 77.947** (1.242) 77.452** (1.190) 77.087** (1.202) 77.991** (1.206)
R2 .504** .504** .488** .493** .720**

Note:

*

p<.08,

**

p<.05. Results presented are from stepwise multiple regression analyses investigating the relation between executive function variables and communication ability. Higher order terms (i.e., interactions) were evaluated first, with non-significant terms removed to maintain parsimony. Group included alcohol-exposed (AE) and typically-developing control (CON) subjects. Inhibition (INI) was measured by Total Errors scaled score from the NEPSY-II; Twenty Questions (20Q) was measured by Initial Abstraction scaled score from the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS). The dependent variable, communication, was measured by the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales – Second Edition (VABS-II) Communication domain standard score.

a

The final model consisted of INI main effect and Group x 20Q interaction effect.