Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov;81:330–331. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.10.009

Table 1.

Progress of CLP-PEG and RHCIII-MPC implants grafted into corneas of mini-pigs, compared to untreated contralateral control eyes over the 12 month post-operation period.

Treatment Time Cornea thickness (mm) Haze Vascularization
Schirmer's tear test (mm) Aesthesiometry (mm) IOP (mmHg)
Implant Margin
CLP-PEG Pre-op 706 ± 20 0 0 0 12 ± 3 3.9 ± 0.3 10 ± 1
1 m 0.38 0.5 1.75 7 ± 1 0
3 m 690 ± 16 0.25 1.75 0 13 ± 3 1.3 ± 0.4 16 ± 2
6 m 702 ± 22 0 0 0.75 12 ± 1 3.4 ± 0.1 16 ± 2
9 m 724 ± 13 0 0 0.5 16 ± 2 2.9 ± 0.1 19 ± 8
12 m 747 ± 8 0 0 2 13 ± 4 3.4 ± 0.1 22 ± 2



RHCIII-MPC Pre-op 704 ± 21 0 0 0 11 ± 3 4.4 ± 0.6 11 ± 1
1 m 0.38 0.5 0.5 7 ± 2 0
3 m 652 ± 9 0.69 1.75 0.5 15 ± 2 0.4 ± 0.4 14 ± 2
6 m 669 ± 22 0 0 2 13 ± 2 3.3 ± 0.4 20 ± 2
9 m 687 ± 11 0 0 0 13 ± 4 2.9 ± 0.2 16 ± 2
12 m 693 ± 23 0 0 0 15 ± 4 3.8 ± 0.1 15 ± 1



Untreated Pre-op 725 ± 11 0 0 0 8 ± 2 4.4 ± 0.3 11 ± 1
1 m 0 0 0 9 ± 1 4.1 ± 0.4
3 m 730 ± 10 0 0 0 12 ± 2 3.4 ± 0.1 17 ± 2
6 m 738 ± 10 0 0 0 10 ± 1 3.9 ± 0.1 17 ± 3
9 m 747 ± 11 0 0 0 13 ± 3 3.3 ± 0.3 16 ± 6
12 m 767 ± 11 0 0 0 15 ± 2 3.6 ± 0.2 18 ± 2