Table 2.
Comparisons of current guideline vs. proposed changes to TR grading.
| Proposed TR grading | Current guidelines |
|---|---|
| “Massive” for TR one grade above severe and “torrential” for the most severe form of TR possible | Made provision for massive TR qualitatively. No clear semi-quantitative or quantitative definition |
| Different thresholds for EROA obtained from PISA and quantitative Doppler methods | No distinction between EROA obtained from PISA and quantitative Doppler |
| EROAs and regurgitant volumes for massive and torrential TR were defined. | Only thresholds for severe (EROA ≥40 mm2 and R Vol ≥45 ml) were defined. |
| Use of 3D vena contracta/effective regurgitant orifice area (the resultant value should be comparable to EROA obtained from quantitative Doppler) | No mention of 3D assessment |
| Use of biplane vena contracta | Did not emphasise the use of biplane vena contracta |