Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov;19(11):871–883. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1800085

Table 3.

Comparison between DICGA and LC-MS/MS for quantification of OTA and ZEN in corn, wheat, and feed samples

 Sample DICGA (μg/kg)
LC-MS/MS (μg/kg)
OTA ZEN OTA ZEN
 Corn 1 19.99±2.21 14.87±0.11
 Corn 2 72.91±4.18 109.14±0.06
 Corn 3 70.22±3.43 85.03±0.29
 Corn 4 25.71±2.24 32.36±0.14
 Corn 5 28.43±3.02 38.19±0.21
 Corn 6 17.12±0.75 22.94±0.02
 Corn 7 28.95±2.51 25.57±0.01
 Corn 8 28.15±1.68 21.25±0.11
 Corn 9 13.34±1.16 20.42±0.07
 Corn 13 83.05±6.38 65.23±0.11
 Wheat 1 15.12±0.95 20.99±1.01
 Wheat 2 34.92±1.18 49.24±0.12
 Wheat 3 38.41±3.27 29.07±0.16
 Wheat 4 139.47±8.91 169.66±0.11
 Wheat 5 38.74±3.24 27.71±0.03
 Wheat 6 25.41±2.29 34.21±0.19
 Wheat 7 63.77±5.24 38.21±1.88 49.55±0.04 29.14±0.11
 Wheat 12 17.84±1.78 24.19±0.44
 Feed 1 29.49±2.97 36.86±0.09
 Feed 3 27.42±0.87 20.01±0.01
 Feed 5 71.54±3.04 59.88±0.03
 Feed 7 59.31±2.71 65.79±6.65 46.92±0.02 106.27±1.02
 Feed 8 25.13±1.48 32.36±0.14
 Feed 9 29.37±2.02 22.46±0.15
 Feed 10 171.12±9.74 140.75±0.51
 Feed 11 38.11±4.47 30.34±2.19
 Feed 12 36.62±1.27 27.03±0.31
 Feed 13 17.92±1.71 15.97±0.01

Data are expressed as mean±standard deviation (n=3)