Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 16.
Published in final edited form as: Risk Anal. 2018 Apr 12;38(9):1962–1971. doi: 10.1111/risa.13000

Table IV.

Pneumoconiosis in Coal Mines Regression Results

Estimate Std. Error t Value p Value Incident Risk Ratio
(IRR)
IRR 95% CI Lower
Bound
IRR 95% CI Upper
Bound
Base Models: Control variables
Miner age 0.08** 0.03 2.83 0.005 1.08 1.02 1.14
Mining tenure 0.13*** 0.03 4.92 <.001 1.14 1.08 1.20
Model 1: Management practices
Miner age 0.05 0.04 1.15 0.25 1.05 0.99 1.14
Mining tenure 0.06 0.04 1.59 0.11 1.06 0.99 1.15
U.S. region 1.22*** 0.42 −2.89 <.001 3.40 1.48 7.78
Mine type 2.08*** 0.24 −8.69 <.001 8.00 5.00 12.80
Management practices 0.12** 0.04 2.86 0.004 1.12 1.04 1.16
Model 2: Engineering controls
Miner age 0.07 0.04 1.54 0.12 1.07 0.98 1.16
Mining tenure 0.07 0.04 1.68 0.09 1.07 0.99 1.15
U.S. region 1.00** 0.41 −2.44 0.01 2.73 1.22 6.12
Mine type 2.28*** 0.24 −9.60 <.001 9.78 6.14 15.58
Engineering controls 0.10*** 0.03 3.40 <.001 1.10 1.04 1.16

Note: n = 1,634.

***

p < 0.001;

**

p < 0.01;

*

p < 0.05. For U.S. region, the Appalachian region is contrasted with the rest of the United States with the rest of the United States as the reference group. For mine type, underground coal is contrasted with surface coal with surface coal mines as the reference group. The interaction terms between workplace practices and conditions from 1996 to 2005 and mining type and U.S. region were not significant.