Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Causes Control. 2018 Jun 26;29(8):707–719. doi: 10.1007/s10552-018-1052-x

Table 4.

Age-adjusted risk of glioma and glioblastoma by nine categories of body somatotype at ages 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, and age in 1988, using Cox proportional hazard modeling

Tertilea NHS (n = 201)
HPFS (n = 138)
Cases Hazard ratio 95% CI Cases Hazard ratio 95% CI

Glioma
    Age 5 body diagrams
        Low (1) 83 Ref 48 Ref
        Middle (2) 53 0.84 0.62–1.13 34 1.18 0.79–1.75
        High (3–9) 63 0.65 0.49–0.87 52 1.08 0.76–1.51
    Age 10 body diagrams
        Low (1) 65 Ref 29 Ref
        Middle (2) (2–3) 56 0.71 0.53–0.95 70 1.13 0.81–1.57
        High (3–9) (4–9) 79 0.65 0.50–0.84 37 1.12 0.75–1.66
    Age 20 body diagrams
        Low (1–2) 76 Ref 47 Ref
        Middle (3) 69 0.74 0.57–0.98 40 0.88 0.61–1.28
        High (4–9) 56 0.79 0.59–1.06 49 0.92 0.65–1.31
    Age 30 body diagrams
        Low (1–2) (1–3) 50 Ref 64 Ref
        Middle (3) (4) 84 0.65 0.50–0.84 37 0.76 0.52–1.11
        High (4–9) (5–9) 65 0.54 0.41–0.72 35 0.90 0.61–1.33
    Age 40 body diagrams
        Middle (1–3) 92 Ref 37 Ref
        Middle (4) 65 0.65 0.49–0.86 45 0.89 0.62–1.29
        High (5–9) 44 0.55 0.40–0.76 55 0.82 0.58–1.16
    Age in 1988 body diagrams
        Low (1–3) (1–4) 57 Ref 63 Ref
        Middle (4) (5) 66 0.61 0.46–0.81 46 0.79 0.56–1.12
        High (5–9) (6–9) 78 0.52 0.40–0.67 29 0.82 0.54–1.24

Tertilea NHS (n = 123)
HPFS (n = 100)
Cases Hazard Ratio 95% CI Cases Hazard Ratio 95% CI

Glioblastoma
    Age 5 body diagrams
        Low (1) 50 Ref 34 Ref
        Middle (2) 37 1.01 0.70–1.47 27 1.41 0.90–2.22
        High (3–9) 34 0.61 0.42–0.89 37 1.16 0.77–1.74
    Age 10 body diagrams
        Low (1) 37 Ref 17 Ref
        Middle (2) (2–3) 40 0.89 0.62–1.28 56 1.47 0.99–2.18
        High (3 –9) (4–9) 45 0.66 0.46–0.93 26 1.29 0.80–2.10
    Age 20 body diagrams
        Low (1–2) 45 Ref 30 Ref
        Middle (3) 41 0.78 0.54–1.11 31 1.08 0.70–1.67
        High (4–9) 37 0.91 0.63–1.32 38 1.14 0.75–1.72
    Age 30 body diagrams
        Low (1–2) (1–3) 32 Ref 45 Ref
        Middle (3) (4) 49 0.66 0.47–0.92 27 0.83 0.53–1.29
        High (4–9) (5–9) 42 0.61 0.42–0.87 27 1.05 0.67–1.64
    Age 40 body diagrams
        Low (1–3) 56 Ref 25 Ref
        Middle (4) 38 0.65 0.45–0.93 34 1.04 0.67–1.60
        High (5–9) 29 0.63 0.42–0.94 41 0.95 0.63–1.44
    Age in 1988 body diagrams
        Low (1–3) (1–4) 29 Ref 44 Ref
        Middle (4) (5) 43 0.73 0.51–1.04 33 0.81 0.54–1.23
        High (5–9) (6–9) 51 0.62 0.44–0.87 21 0.84 0.51–1.36

HPFS Health Professionals Follow-Up Study, NHS Nurses’ Health Study

a

Somatotypes categorized by tertiles for each cohort. Numbers in parentheses indicate which somatotypes fall into each tertile for NHS and HPFS