Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 30;3(4):e15. doi: 10.2196/diabetes.8645

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of participants.

Variable Unadjusted Pa value Before PSWb After PSW, comparison mean (n=140) Pc value


Intervention frequency (n=50), n (%) Comparison frequency (n=160), n (%)
Intervention mean (n=38) Comparison mean (n=140)

Clinic <.001


<.001

Site 1 18 (36) 21 (13.1) d 0.37 0.12 0.12

Site 2 32 (64) 139 (86.9)
Age group, in years .53



18-44 12 (24) 28 (17.5) 0.29 0.17 0.19 .19

45-54 16 (32) 50 (31.2) 0.32 0.31 0.32 <.001

55-64 22 (44) 82 (51.3) 0.39 0.52 0.49 .29
Gender .16


.67

Male 23 (46) 56 (35.0) 0.42 0.35 0.38

Female 27 (54) 104 (65.0)
Primary language .09


.08

English 17 (34) 76 (47.5) 0.26 0.45 0.42

Spanish 33 (66) 84 (52.5)
Race and ethnicity .43




Hispanic or Latino 37 (74) 108 (67.5) 0.79 0.69 0.74 .50

White 5 (10) 18 (11.3) 0.05 0.12 0.10 .32

Other 8 (16) 26 (16.3) 0.16 0.16 0.16 >.99

Missing 0 (0) 8 (5.0)
Smoking status .53


.34

Current nonsmoker 48 (96) 147 (91.9) 0.03 0.07 0.07

Current smoker 2 (4) 13 (8.1)

aP values are for chi-square tests or Fisher exact test where cell frequencies are less than 5.

bPSW: propensity score weighting.

cP values are for t tests.

dNot applicable.