Table 2.
Rubric for evaluating translation quality.
|
|
Fluency | Adequacy | Meaning | Severity |
| 1 | No fluency; no appreciable grammar, not understandable |
0% of information conveyed from the original | Totally different meaning from the original | Dangerous to patient |
| 2 | Marginal fluency; several grammatical errors |
25% of information conveyed from the original | Misleading information added/omitted compared to the original | Impairs care in some way |
| 3 | Good fluency; several grammatical errors, understandable |
50% of information conveyed from the original | Partially the same meaning as the original | Delays necessary care |
| 4 | Excellent fluency; few grammatical errors |
75% of information conveyed from the original | Almost the same meaning as the original | Unclear effect on patient care |
| 5 | Perfect fluency; like reading a newspaper |
100% of information conveyed from the original | Same meaning as the original | No effect on patient care |