Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 15;1(1):2473974X17698647. doi: 10.1177/2473974X17698647

Table 3.

Average of Quality Improvement Confidence Instrument (QICI) Responses by Residents, before and after Completion of the First Half of the Patient Safety/Quality Improvement (PSQI) Curriculum.a

Steps of PSQI Project Development Mean (SD) QICI Response Before PSQI Curriculum Implementation Mean (SD) QICI Response After PSQI Curriculum Implementation Mean Difference (95% Confidence Interval) P Value
Describing an Issue 3.05 (0.80) 3.91 (0.37) 0.86 (0.29-1.43) .01
Building a Team 3.07 (0.78) 3.80 (0.70) 0.73 (0.14-1.32) .02
Defining the Problem 3.13 (0.59) 3.98 (0.39) 0.85 (0.44-1.26) .002
Choosing a Target 2.27 (0.96) 3.59 (0.47) 1.32 (0.67-1.97) .002
Testing the Change 3.08 (0.55) 3.90 (0.48) 0.82 (0.41-1.23) .002
Extending Improvement Efforts 3.01 (0.62) 3.55 (0.44) 0.54 (0.05-1.03) .03
a

1 = not at all confident; 2 = a little confident; 3 = neutral; 4 = confident; 5 = very confident. Response rate for this instrument was 100% (n = 11).