Table II.
Unadjusted and Adjusted associations between intoxication during sex work and recent GBV (N=496)
| Characteristics | Bivariatea | Multivariablea | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | p-value | AOR (95% CI) | p-value | |
| Age | 0.98 (0.95, 1.01) | 0.13 | 0.96 (0.93, 0.99) | 0.04 |
| Earn an average of 120,000 Tsh or more per month (~$55 USD) | 1.42 (0.99, 2.04) | 0.06 | 1.29 (0.86, 1.92) | 0.21 |
| Relationship status | ||||
| Single | (reference) | -- | (reference) | -- |
| In a steady relationship but not married | 1.04 (0.63, 1.72) | 0.88 | 1.07 (0.62, 1.85) | 0.82 |
| Married | 0.87 (0.46, 1.64) | 0.67 | 1.03 (0.50, 2.11) | 0.94 |
| Knowledge of HIV status | ||||
| HIV negative | (reference) | -- | (reference) | -- |
| HIV positive unaware | 0.98 (0.65, 1.48) | 0.92 | 0.96 (0.61, 1.52) | 0.87 |
| HIV positive aware | 1.65 (0.95, 2.86) | 0.08 | 1.96 (1.02, 3.78) | 0.04 |
| Meet clients in bars | 0.82 (0.45, 1.51) | 0.53 | 0.66 (0.33, 1.31) | 0.23 |
| Frequent intoxication druing sex work in the past 30 days | 1.84 (1.28, 2.66) | 0.001 | 1.64 (1.07, 2.49) | 0.02 |
| Clients expect FSW to consume alcohol during sex work | 1.42 (0.96, 2.08) | 0.08 | 1.24 (0.79, 1.94) | 0.35 |
| Ever denied payment for sex work completed | 2.16 (1.46, 3.18) | <0.001 | 1.74 (1.15, 2.64) | 0.01 |
| Social cohesion among sex workers in venue | 1.07 (1.02, 1.11) | 0.002 | 1.06 (1.01, 1.10) | 0.01 |
| Internalized sex work stigma | 1.03 (1.00, 1.06) | 0.036 | 1.03 (1.00, 1.07) | 0.03 |
| Mafinga study community | 0.83 (0.56, 1.24) | 0.367 | 0.59 (0.38, 0.94) | 0.03 |
a
Adjusted for intraclass correlation due to clustering in venues