Table III.
Unadjusted and adjusted odds of consistent condom use with all clients in the past 30 days among the cohort at baseline (N=496)
| Characteristics | Bivariatea | Multivariablea | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | p-value | AOR (95% CI) | p-value | |
| Age | 0.98 (0.95, 1.01) | 0.22 | 0.96 (0.93, 0.99) | 0.04 |
| Earn an average of 120,000 Tsh or more per month (~$55 USD) | 1.53 (1.04, 2.24) | 0.03 | 1.65 (1.09, 2.51) | 0.02 |
| Relationship status | ||||
| Single | (reference) | -- | (reference) | -- |
| In a steady relationship but not married | 1.68 (0.95, 2.96) | 0.07 | 1.73 (0.93, 3.19) | 0.08 |
| Married | 2.04 (1.03, 4.03) | 0.04 | 2.06 (0.95, 4.25) | 0.07 |
| Knowledge of HIV status | ||||
| HIV negative | (reference) | -- | (reference) | -- |
| HIV positive unaware | 0.95 (0.62, 1.47) | 0.83 | 1.17 (0.72, 1.88) | 0.53 |
| HIV positive aware | 1.68 (0.96, 2.94) | 0.07 | 2.39 (1.23, 4.66) | 0.01 |
| Recent GBV | 0.95 (0.65, 1.39) | 0.78 | 0.92 (0.60, 1.42) | 0.72 |
| Frequent intoxication druing sex work in the past 30 days | 0.54 (0.36, 0.79) | 0.002 | 0.58 (0.37, 0.92) | 0.02 |
| Clients expect FSW to consume alcohol during sex work | 0.69 (0.47, 1.01) | 0.06 | 0.91 (0.58, 1.44) | 0.69 |
| Meet clients in bars | 0.55 (0.30, 1.00) | 0.05 | 0.61 (0.31, 1.22) | 0.16 |
| Social cohesion among sex workers in venue | 0.99 (0.95, 1.03) | 0.61 | 0.98 (0.94, 1.03) | 0.44 |
| Sex work stigma | 1.03 (0.99, 1.06) | 0.06 | 1.03 (0.99, 1.06) | 0.12 |
| Somewhat easy access to condoms in the past 6 months | 1.36 (0.82, 2.28) | 0.24 | 1.45 (0.82, 2.55) | 0.20 |
| Mafinga study community | 1.39 (0.91, 2.12) | 0.13 | 1.26 (0.78, 2.03) | 0.25 |
a
Adjusted for intraclass correlation due to clustering in venues