Table IV.
Adjusted odds of consistent condom use with all clients in the past 30 days, stratified by experiences of recent GBV
| Characteristics | No recent GBV (n=299) | Recent GBV (n=197) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AOR (95% CI)a | AOR (95% CI)a | |||
| p-value | p-value | |||
| Age | 0.95 (0.90, 0.99) | 0.03 | 0.98 (0.92, 1.04) | 0.55 |
| Earn an average of 120,000 Tsh or more per month (~$55 USD) | 1.58 (0.91, 2.74) | 0.10 | 1.87 (0.93, 3.75) | 0.08 |
| Relationship status | ||||
| Single | (reference) | -- | (reference) | -- |
| In a steady relationship but not married | 2.46 (1.03, 5.89) | 0.04 | 1.06 (0.39, 2.82) | 0.91 |
| Married | 4.02 (1.43, 11.32) | 0.01 | 0.74 (0.19, 2.74) | 0.65 |
| Knowledge of HIV status | ||||
| HIV negative | (reference) | -- | (reference) | -- |
| HIV positive unaware | 1.63 (0.89, 3.01) | 0.12 | 0.53 (0.22, 1.28) | 0.16 |
| HIV positive aware | 2.18 (0.80, 3.01) | 0.13 | 2.63 (1.03, 6.70) | 0.04 |
| Frequent intoxication druing sex work in the past 30 days | 0.74 (0.39, 1.37) | 0.34 | 0.37 (0.17, 0.77) | 0.01 |
| Clients expect FSW to consume alcohol during sex work | 0.86 (0.47, 1.56) | 0.62 | 0.81 (0.37, 1.76) | 0.59 |
| Meet clients in bars | 0.95 (0.36, 2.50) | 0.91 | 0.41 (0.14, 1.2) | 0.10 |
| Social cohesion among sex workers in venue | 0.97 (0.92, 1.04) | 0.41 | 0.97 (0.90, 1.05) | 0.45 |
| Sex work stigma | 1.03 (0.98, 1.07) | 0.21 | 1.03 (0.97, 1.08) | 0.33 |
| Somewhat easy access to condoms in the past 6 months | 1.20 (0.54, 2.67) | 0.65 | 1.72 (0.73, 4.08) | 0.22 |
| Mafinga study community | 1.58 (0.89, 2.78) | 0.11 | 0.89 (0.44, 1.80) | 0.75 |
a
Adjusted for intraclass correlation due to clustering in venues