Table 1.
All | Single-Copy Eukaryotic | Matches to Single-Copy Genome Clusters | |
---|---|---|---|
Cochliopodium spp. | |||
aC. pentatrifurcatum | 7.99% | 4.87% | 4.17% |
aC. minus CCAP 1537/1A | 5.89% | 3.60% | 2.91% |
C. pentatrifurcatum vs. C. minus CCAP 1537/1A | 9.31% | 4.31% | 3.95% |
C. pentatrifurcatum vs. C. minutoidum CCAP 1537/7 | 99.96% | 99.92% | 100% |
Endostelium zonatum | |||
PRA-191 YT10 vs. PRA-191 Kang | 6.81% | 4.77% | 4.02% |
PRA-191 YT10 vs. LINKS | 99.84% | 99.77% | 99.82% |
PRA-191 Kang vs. LINKS | 99.83% | 100% | 100% |
Thecamoebida isolates | |||
UK-YT1 vs. Thecamoebida RHP1–1 | 10.58% | 5.56% | 4.19% |
aintraspecific comparison of transcriptome data from same species collected using different methods