Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addict Behav. 2018 Oct 1;89:143–150. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.09.036

Table 2.

Logistic Regression Models of Social Interactions on Substance Use and Treatment Initiation among Probationers.

Substance Usea
Treatment Initiationb
2-monthc
6-monthd
2-monthe
6-monthf
OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI

Model 1
 SS Quantity 1.12 (0.88, 1.43) 1.19 (0.89, 1.58) 0.97 (0.70, 1.36) 1.17 (0.88, 1.57)
 SS Quality 0.36* (0.20, 0.65) 0.50* (0.25, 0.99) 0.82 (0.38, 1.75) 0.49* (0.25, 0.96)
Model 2
 SS Quantity 1.15 (0.89, 1.50) 1.32 (0.97, 1.79) 0.95 (0.66, 1.36) 1.11 (0.81, 1.52)
 Positive Support 0.60* (0.39, 0.90) 0.49** (0.29, 0.81) 1.01 (0.58, 1.78) 0.93 (0.57, 1.52)
 Negative Support 1.66* (1.05, 2.64) 1.03 (0.60, 1.77) 1.22 (0.66, 2.28) 1.86* (1.08, 3.20)
Model 3
 SS Quantity 1.15 (0.90, 1.48) 1.25 (0.93, 1.67) 0.97 (0.69, 1.35) 1.08 (0.84, 1.38)
 SS Quality 0.43** (0.24, 0.80) 0.66 (0.32, 1.35) 0.76 (0.34, 1.71) 0.52 (0.26, 1.06)
 Relationship Conflict 1.24* (1.01, 1.52) 1.40** (1.07, 1.84) 0.93 (0.69, 1.24) 1.19 (0.88, 159)

Note: OR = Odds Ratio; 95% CI = 95% Confidence Interval.

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001.

a

Models controlled for participant age, gender, race, and criminal risk level.

b

Models controlled for participant age, gender, race, criminal risk level and whether the probationer was mandated to attend s ubstance use treatment.

c

N = 295.

d

N = 285.

e

N = 277.

f

N = 268.