Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 12;12:418. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00418

Table 5.

Pearson's correlations for the normalized CCM-spectral values considering the same target areas in different frequency bands for the sleep-related fatigue levels NO and HR.

Targets NO HR
SOURCE: FRONTAL MIDLINE
Left anterior θ: 0.5622 0.9867
α: 0.9974 0.0684
β: 0.9773 −0.9129
γ: 0.9617 −0.9387
Right anterior β: 0.7320 −0.8859
γ: 0.0815 −0.9877
Right motor θ: 0.8766 0.9491
γ: 0.9920 −0.9716
Parietal midline θ: 0.7685 0.9666
α: 0.5330 0.9933
Right parietal β: −0.9527 0.9676
γ: 0.9938 −0.7273
SOURCE: PARIETAL MIDLINE
Left motor θ: 0.9319 0.9399
α: 0.9861 0.9038
Right motor γ: 0.9788 −0.8707
Left parietal θ: 0.6080 0.9916
α: 0.9180 0.1632
β: 0.6131 −0.9460
Right parietal β: −0.9363 0.9834
γ: 0.9389 −0.9494
Left occipital θ: −0.8264 −0.6177
α: 0.9674 0.6303

On the left, the source of CCM is the Frontal Midline Area. On the right, the source is the Parietal Midline Area. The first column of each Table specifies the target areas. The choice was based on the simultaneous significant differences in distributions and slopes between those two levels (marked as gray in Tables 3, 4). Both measures were sorted by DPs within the interval [2, 4]. See Figure 5 for the plots of the case from the Frontal Midline source to the Parietal Midline target.